Genetic Relationships Among Ecotypes of Suaeda vermiculata in Saline Environments of Khuzestan Province (Iran) Using Multi-Marker Approaches

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduate, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran,

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Suaeda vermiculata is a halophytic shrub that plays a key ecological role in saline habitats of Khuzestan Province, Iran. Its genetic variation across regional ecotypes remains poorly understood. In this study, 27 representative ecotypes from northern (n = 19) and southern (n = 8) Khuzestan were analyzed using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. ISSR primers revealed broad genome-wide polymorphism, whereas SCoT markers provided higher resolution at the ecotype level. Genetic diversity indices, including Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon’s information index (I), indicated higher allelic richness in northern ecotypes, with minor local variation in southern ones. Cluster and principal coordinate analyses revealed only weak geographic differentiation among ecotypes. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that over 90% of genetic variation is distributed within regions. The statistically significant PhiPT values for both markers revealed weak but meaningful regional structuring. These findings highlight the complementary value of ISSR and SCoT markers for studying genetic patterns in halophytes. From a conservation perspective, preserving multiple ecotypes from both northern and southern Khuzestan is important to safeguard evolutionary potential and adaptive capacity in heterogeneous saline environments.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Suaeda vermiculata Forssk. ex J.F.Gmel., a halophytic species from the Amaranthaceae family (formerly Chenopodiaceae), is recognized as the accepted name in the Flora of Iran, with S. fruticosa Forssk. ex J.F.Gmel. treated as its synonym (Assadi, 2001). This species is naturally distributed across arid and semi-arid regions of the Middle East and North Africa, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Jordan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt (Assadi, 2001; Dinarvand, 2020). In Iran, it is predominantly found in southern provinces, particularly Khuzestan, where it inhabits saline flats, marshes, and roadsides (Akhani, 2015). S. vermiculata demonstrates exceptional tolerance to abiotic stresses, especially salinity, making it a valuable component of salt-affected ecosystems. Its ecological functions include soil stabilization, phytoremediation, and habitat restoration (Al-Shamsi et al., 2020). Moreover, its seeds are rich in unsaturated fatty acids, underscoring their potential as an alternative source of edible oil (Weber et al., 2007; Mahdavi Lasini et al., 2017). Recent investigations in Iran have further revealed that the seeds contain considerable amounts of both saturated fatty acids, predominantly margaric acid, and unsaturated fatty acids, mainly linoleic acid (Assadi et al., 2014).

Assessing genetic diversity is crucial for understanding plant adaptation mechanisms and guiding conservation efforts. Advances in molecular marker technologies, particularly PCR-based methods, have significantly improved the resolution of genetic diversity analysis (Bidyananda et al., 2024). Among these, inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers are frequently used due to their technical simplicity, high reproducibility, and effectiveness in detecting polymorphisms. Both ISSR and SCoT are dominant, multilocus markers scored by the presence or absence of amplification products. They require no prior sequence information and have been applied across a wide range of plant taxa to evaluate population variability and ecological differentiation (Amom et al., 2020; Hromadová et al., 2023). By targeting inter-microsatellite regions (ISSR) and conserved ATG-flanking regions (SCoT), these complementary markers provide robust tools for examining genome-wide polymorphism and fine-scale genetic structuring in stressful environments such as saline habitats. Several studies highlight the utility of these markers in Suaeda and related halophytes. For instance, SCoT has revealed population structure in S. maritima (L.) Dumort. (Jayasundara et al., 2024) and high within-population variability in S. aegyptiaca (Hasselq.) Zohary from Khuzestan (Haghighipor et al., 2024). ISSR has facilitated comparative analyses of Suaeda species in the western Anbar plateau, Iraq (Alrawi et al., 2023), while combined ISSR/SCoT approaches have captured extensive polymorphism among 29 wild halophytes in Saudi Arabia (Alotaibi & Abd-Elgawad, 2022). Moreover, genetic studies on Suaeda species from the Mediterranean coast of Egypt confirmed high levels of polymorphism using ISSR markers (Abd El-Maboud & Khalil, 2013). Collectively, these findings substantiate the informativeness of ISSR and SCoT for quantifying genetic variability and geographic structuring in salt-affected ecosystems, thereby providing a comparative framework for the present investigation. Building on this evidence, it is notable that, despite the ecological significance of S. vermiculata in Iran’s saline landscapes, particularly in Khuzestan Province, no molecular study has been conducted on this species in the country to date. Given its remarkable adaptability and combined ecological and economic value, an analysis of its genetic makeup can provide valuable insights into local variation, support conservation efforts, and inform sustainable use.

 

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

A total of 52 ecotypes of S. vermiculata were collected from diverse saline habitats across Khuzestan Province, Iran. Species identification was confirmed based on morphological characteristics using the Flora of Iran (Assadi, 2001) and the Flora of Khuzestan (Mozaffarian, 1999; Dinarvand, 2020). All specimens were properly documented and preserved in silica gel. From these, 27 ecotypes were selected based on ecological conditions and DNA quality/quantity. They were grouped according to geographic origin, with 19 from northern and 8 from southern Khuzestan (Table 1), reflecting differences in site accessibility. Genomic DNA was extracted from young shoots using a commercial kit (Parstous, Iran) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality, quantity, and integrity were assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, while purity was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (model ND-2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) by determining the OD 260/280 ratio.

 

Table 1. Geographic coordinates of the 27 Suaeda vermiculata ecotypes collected from Khuzestan Province, Iran

A: Northern Khuzestan ecotypes

No.

Ecotype code

Latitude (N)

Longitude (E)

1

AH1

31°37'35.3"

48°40'03.0"

2

AH3

31°22'35.3"

48°42'44.4"

3

AH4

31°13'35.5"

48°38'53.7"

4

AH5

31°16'35.7"

48°39'21.4"

5

SHN1

31°23'22.2"

48°47'06.4"

6

M1

31°18'14.1"

48°33'47.3"

7

M2

31°18'12.3"

48°34'09.9"

8

SH1

31°32'35.3"

48°40'03.0"

9

SH2

31°34'11.0"

48°41'15.3"

10

K1

31°35'01.0"

48°40'14.3"

11

K2

31°36'55.3"

48°42'21.0"

12

HM2

31°44'02.7"

48°50'48.1"

13

HM3

31°46'09.0"

48°36'43.6"

14

SO1

31°37'34.2"

48°36'04.0"

15

SO2

31°48'09.5"

48°32'10.0"

16

SO3

31°48'26.9"

48°31'26.0"

17

HO1

31°44'02.7"

48°50'48.1"

18

HO2

31°38'13.4"

48°55'01.5"

19

DK

31°37'34.2"

48°36'04.0"

B: Southern Khuzestan ecotypes

 

No.

Ecotype code

Latitude (N)

Longitude (E)

20

AB1

30°50'24.3"

48°32'03.8"

21

AB2

30°22'51.8"

48°15'40.2"

22

MN1

30°21'33.8"

48°12'08.8"

23

MN2

30°21'34.8"

48°12'10.4"

24

SLM1

30°45'51.3"

48°15'22.3"

25

SLM2

30°43'47.5"

48°17'50.3"

26

KH1

30°46'12.6"

48°15'26.6"

27

KH2

30°37'35.3"

48°20'37.0"

PCR amplification

Twelve ISSR primers previously reported in different plant studies (Behera et al., 2008; Badlani, 2011; Kumar & Rajvanshi, 2015; Sharma et al., 2015; Rezaei et al., 2018) and six SCoT primers designed by Collard & Mackill (2009) were selected for the present analysis (Table 2). PCR reactions were performed in a 10 μL final volume containing 5 μL of 2X PCR Master Mix RED (Ampliqon), 0.8 μL of template DNA (35–50 ng), 0.3 μL of primer (10 pmol μL⁻¹), and ddH₂O up to 10 μL. Optimal annealing temperatures for each primer were determined using a gradient thermal cycler, and the final thermal cycling conditions are listed in Table 3. PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels, stained, and visualized under UV light.

 

Table 2. Sequences and characteristics of ISSR and SCoT primers used in this study

     Primer

Sequence (5′→3′)

     GC (%)

Tm (°C)

     SCoT34

ACCATGGCTACCACCGCA

55.6

50.3

     SCoT13

ACGACATGGCGACCATCG

50.0

48.0

     SCoT14

ACGACATGGCGACCACGC

61.1

52.6

     SCoT20

ACCATGGCTACCACCGCG

66.7

54.9

     SCoT26

ACCATGGCTACCACCGTC

61.1

52.6

     SCoT5

CAACAATGGCTACCACGA

72.2

57.1

     ISSR1

CACACACACACAGG

57.1

36.5

     ISSR2

CACACACACACAAC

50.0

41.5

     ISSR3

CACACACACACAAG

50.0

41.5

     ISSR4

AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGT

47.1

45.0

     ISSR5

AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGC

52.9

51.1

     ISSR6

CACACACACACACACAAGG

52.6

51.1

     ISSR7

ACACACACACACACACG

52.9

49.3

     ISSR8

TATTCCGACGCTGAGGCAG

57.9

49.3

     ISSR9

GGAGAGGAGAGGAGA

60.4

46.4

     ISSR10

GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGT

50.5

44.5

     ISSR11

GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGATC

50.0

44.0

     ISSR12

CCAACGATGAAGAACGCAGC

55.8

53.8

 

Table 3. Thermal cycling conditions for PCR amplification using ISSR and SCoT markers

         Step

Cycle

Time

Temperature (°C)

Marker

   Initial denaturation

1

4 min

95

ISSR / SCoT

   Denaturation

30

30 s

95

ISSR

 

30

50 s

95

SCoT

   Annealing

30

45 s

36–41

ISSR

 

30

50 s

50

SCoT

   Extension

30

1:30–2:00 min

72

ISSR

 

30

1:30–1:50 min

72

SCoT

   Final extension

1

7 min

72

ISSR

 

1

10 min

72

SCoT

 

Data scoring and statistical analyses

Band scoring was performed in a binary format by recording the presence (1) or absence (0) of each band across the ecotypes. For subsequent analyses, ecotypes were classified into two regional groups representing northern and southern Khuzestan to facilitate regional comparisons of genetic diversity and structure. Polymorphism parameters, including the total number and percentage of polymorphic bands (P%), resolving power (Rp) (Prevost & Wilkinson, 1999), polymorphism information content (PIC) (Roldan-Ruiz et al., 2000), effective multiplex ratio (EMR), and marker index (MI) (Nagaraju et al., 2001), were calculated according to standard formulas. Additional genetic diversity indices, such as the observed number of alleles (Na), effective number of alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity (h), Shannon’s information index (I), and the percentage of polymorphic loci (PL%) within each regional group, were calculated using GenAlEx v6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012). Genetic similarity among 27 S. vermiculata ecotypes was estimated using the Jaccard coefficient, which is appropriate for presence/absence binary data. Multivariate genetic relationships were examined through UPGMA cluster analysis in NTSYS-pc v2.2 (Rohlf, 2005) and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) implemented in GenAlEx v6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012). Genetic structure was assessed using STRUCTURE v2.3.4 (Pritchard et al., 2000) under the admixture model with correlated allele frequencies and assuming a recessive alleles model appropriate for dominant markers (ISSR and SCoT). Analyses were conducted for K values ranging from 1 to 10, with ten independent runs per K. Each run consisted of a burn-in period of 10,000 iterations followed by 100,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) repetitions. The most likely number of clusters (K) was determined using the ΔK method (Evanno et al., 2005). Run outputs were summarized and visualized using StructureSelector (Li & Liu, 2018). Both separate and combined datasets were analyzed using UPGMA, PCoA, and STRUCTURE to provide a comprehensive assessment of genetic relationships among ecotypes. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed in GenAlEx v6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2012) to partition genetic variation within and between northern and southern ecotype groups. Separate analyses were conducted for ISSR and SCoT datasets. Variance components and PhiPT (ΦPT) values were calculated, and statistical significance was assessed using 999 permutations.

 

Results

Primer performance and polymorphism assessment

Out of twelve tested ISSR primers, ten yielded clear and reproducible bands, while ISSR2 and ISSR7 failed to amplify. Among the six SCoT primers, five were successful and reproducible, with SCoT13 not producing any bands. The amplified fragments ranged from 300 to 3000 bp for ISSR primers and 400 to 3000 bp for SCoT primers (Table 4). The ten ISSR primers generated a total of 88 bands, of which 86 (96.6%) were polymorphic. The five successful SCoT primers produced 51 bands, with 43 (79%) being polymorphic. Among SCoT primers, SCoT5 exhibited the highest polymorphism (100%), whereas SCoT26 had the lowest (33%). For ISSR primers, ISSR8 and ISSR10 showed the lowest polymorphism rates (80% and 86%, respectively), while the remaining primers displayed 100% polymorphism. The average polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.31 for ISSR and 0.28 for SCoT primers. The marker index (MI) averaged 2.95 for ISSR and 2.35 for SCoT primers. The highest MI value was observed for SCoT5 (4.67), and the lowest for SCoT26 (0.09). Resolving power (Rp) varied from 4.48 to 12.29, with mean values of 6.34 for ISSR and 9.92 for SCoT, indicating a generally higher discriminatory capacity of SCoT primers (Table 4).

 

Table 4. Summary of the performance of ISSR and SCoT primers in Suaeda vermiculata

Primer

N

Np

P%

Rp

PIC

MI

BZ (bp)

     ISSR

             

     ISSR1

13

13

100

8.59

0.29

3.84

500–2200

     ISSR3

7

7

100

5.30

0.21

1.51

350–1600

     ISSR4

11

11

100

9.85

0.39

4.32

400–1650

     ISSR5

7

7

100

7.33

0.42

2.97

500–1650

     ISSR6

11

11

100

6.64

0.37

4.13

300–2800

     ISSR8

5

4

80

5.61

0.35

1.12

900–2750

     ISSR9

6

6

100

4.75

0.33

1.99

450–2000

     ISSR10

7

6

86

7.48

0.38

1.99

450–1500

     ISSR11

9

9

100

6.63

0.40

3.64

650–3000

     ISSR12

12

12

100

8.26

0.33

4.03

350–3000

     Total

88

86

 

     Mean

8.8

8.6

96.6

6.34

0.34

2.95

 

     SCoT

             

     SCoT34

12

11

92

12.29

0.32

3.22

400–2700

     SCoT14

15

13

87

10.29

0.22

2.57

400–3000

     SCoT20

6

5

83

6.96

0.29

1.21

600–2200

     SCoT26

6

2

33

9.40

0.14

0.09

450–1450

     SCoT5

12

12

100

10.69

0.38

4.67

550–3000

     Total

51

43

 

     Mean

10.2

8.6

79.0

9.92

0.27

2.35

 

N: Total number of bands; Np: Polymorphic bands; P%: Percentage of polymorphism; Rp: Resolving power; PIC: Polymorphism information content; MI: Marker index; BZ: Band size (bp)

 

Intra-regional genetic diversity analysis

The percentage of polymorphic loci (PL%) within the northern ecotype group was 98.86% and 82.35% for ISSR and SCoT markers, respectively. In the southern group, PL% values were 72.73% (ISSR) and 60.78% (SCoT). Nei’s gene diversity (h) values indicated moderate genetic variation within groups, with mean values of 0.25 for ISSR and 0.21 for SCoT markers. Similarly, Shannon’s information index (I) averaged 0.39 for ISSR and 0.33 for SCoT, further supporting the presence of moderate genetic diversity within both regional groups (Table 5).

 

Table 5. Genetic diversity parameters estimated using ISSR and SCoT markers in Suaeda vermiculata ecotypes from Northern and Southern Khuzestan

Marker

Geographic origin

No. of ecotypes

NPL

PL%

Na

Ne

Ne/Na

h

I

 ISSR

   Northern Khuzestan

19

175

98.86

1.98

1.44

0.72

0.27

0.43

 

   Southern Khuzestan

8

134

72.73

1.52

1.38

0.90

0.23

0.35

 

   Mean

154.5

85.79

1.75

1.41

0.81

0.25

0.39

 SCoT

   Northern Khuzestan

19

92

82.35

1.80

1.41

0.78

0.25

0.38

 

   Southern Khuzestan

8

74

60.78

1.45

1.30

0.89

0.18

0.28

 

   Mean

83

71.56

1.62

1.35

0.83

0.21

0.33

NPL: Number of polymorphic loci; PL%: Percentage of polymorphic loci; Na: Mean number of observed alleles; Ne: Mean number of effective alleles; Ne/Na: Allelic evenness ratio; h: Nei’s gene diversity; I: Shannon’s information index

Clustering patterns, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) Bayesian STRUCTURE inference

Because ISSR and SCoT target different genomic regions, the datasets were first analyzed separately, and interpretations of clustering and PCoA were made independently for each marker system. To complement these findings, combined analyses were also performed. Cluster analysis using the UPGMA method based on Jaccard similarity coefficients (Figure 1A–C) revealed considerable genetic variation among the 27 studied ecotypes, with no clear grouping according to geographic origin (Northern Khuzestan vs. Southern Khuzestan). Ecotypes from both regions were intermixed throughout the dendrogram, indicating the absence of distinct regional clusters. A similar pattern was observed in the SCoT-based dendrogram, where northern and southern ecotypes also lacked clear separation. When ISSR and SCoT data were combined, the overall topology remained largely comparable to the single-marker analyses: two small southern subclusters were recovered, yet several southern ecotypes still grouped with northern ones, indicating no pronounced geographic partition.

Figure 1. UPGMA dendrograms based on Jaccard similarity among 27 Suaeda vermiculata ecotypes using (A) ISSR, (B) SCoT and combined ISSR + SCoT (C) datasets. Ecotype codes are suffixed with “-N” (Northern group) or “-S” (Southern group) to indicate geographic origin.

The PCoA analysis based on ISSR (Figure 2A), SCoT (Figure 2B), and combined datasets (Figure 2C) showed no complete separation between northern and southern groups. In the ISSR dataset, the first two axes explained 19.7% of the total variance (PC1 = 10.63%, PC2 = 9.09%). Northern ecotypes generally clustered toward the right side, and southern ecotypes toward the left, although several northern ecotypes overlapped with the southern group, indicating only partial separation. For SCoT, the first two axes explained 22.3% of the variance (PC1 = 11.79%, PC2 = 10.59%), with some southern ecotypes forming small localized clusters. In the combined dataset, the first two axes accounted for 17.8% of the variance (PC1 = 9.0%, PC2 = 8.8%), where southern ecotypes tended to group more closely but still overlapped with those of the northern ecotypes. Overall, north–south differentiation was weak and relative.

 

A: ISSR

 

 

 

B: SCoT

 

 

 

 

C: ISSR + SCoT

 

 

 

Figure 2. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of 27 ecotypes of Suaeda vermiculata based on (A) ISSR (B) SCoT, and combined ISSR + SCoT (C) datasets. Northern (Group 1) and Southern (Group 2) ecotypes are indicated with different symbols.

 

Bayesian clustering analysis in STRUCTURE, using the recessive alleles model appropriate for dominant markers, indicated different optimal K values across datasets. For the ISSR dataset, the ΔK method identified K = 5 as the most likely number of clusters. However, the bar plot (Figure 3A) showed that all 27 ecotypes shared membership across all five clusters, revealing extensive admixture and no clear separation between northern and southern groups. For the SCoT dataset, the ΔK method supported K = 2; however, two alternative clustering modes were recovered at equal frequency across runs. Because both modes showed pervasive admixture and no clear geographic correspondence, only one representative bar plot is presented (Figure 3B). When ISSR and SCoT data were combined, the optimal clustering was inferred at K = 6, consistently recovered in all runs (Figure 3C). Yet, each ecotype exhibited contributions from all six clusters, demonstrating widespread admixture and the absence of region-specific structuring. Collectively, these results indicate that S. vermiculata in Khuzestan exhibits a largely panmictic genetic structure, and lacks clear geographic differentiation.

 

 

A: ISSR

 

 

B: SCoT

 

 

C: ISSR + SCoT

 

 

Figure 3. Bayesian clustering of 27 Suaeda vermiculata ecotypes from northern and southern Khuzestan using (A) ISSR (K = 5), (B) SCoT (K = 2), and (C) combined ISSR + SCoT (K = 6) datasets. Each vertical bar represents a single ecotype. Colors in each panel indicate the dataset-specific genetic clusters; note that colors are not comparable across panels.

 

Analysis of molecular variance

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that most genetic variation occurred within regions (91% for ISSR, 95% for SCoT), whereas only a small proportion was attributable to differences between northern and southern ecotypes (9% and 5%, respectively). Despite this low inter-regional differentiation, both marker systems produced statistically significant PhiPT values (ISSR: 0.093, p = 0.001; SCoT: 0.049, p = 0.019), indicating weak but significant regional structuring (Table 6; Figure 4A–B).

 

Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) partitioning genetic variation among and within Northern and Southern ecotype groups of Suaeda vermiculata based on ISSR and SCoT markers.

 

Marker

Source of variation

df

Sum of squares

Mean square

Estimated variance

% of Total variation

PhiPT

p-value

ISSR

  Among groups

1

33.062

33.062

1.577

9%

0.093

0.001

 

  Within groups

25

382.789

15.312

15.312

91%

 

 

 

  Total

26

415.852

16.888

100%

 

 

SCoT

  Among groups

1

11.787

11.787

0.383

5%

0.049

0.019

 

  Within groups

25

186.954

7.478

7.478

95%

 

 

 

  Total

26

198.741

7.861

100%

 

 

 

A: ISSR

 

B: SCoT

 

Figure 4. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of 27 Suaeda vermiculata ecotypes from Northern and Southern regions of Khuzestan using (A) ISSR and (B) SCoT markers.

 

Discussion

Marker efficiency and polymorphism

In this study, both ISSR and SCoT markers were effective in detecting genetic polymorphism among S. vermiculata ecotypes. However, their performances differed notably. ISSR primers generally amplified more bands and exhibited higher polymorphism. This reflects their ability to capture genome-wide variability. ISSR targets non-coding, microsatellite-flanking regions, which are often highly variable even among closely related individuals (Zietkiewicz et al., 1994; Bornet & Branchard, 2001). In contrast, SCoT primers generated fewer bands but showed higher values for certain efficiency indices, such as resolving power (Rp) and marker index (MI). Their gene-targeted nature, amplifying regions adjacent to the ATG start codon, may make them more informative for identifying functionally relevant differences among ecotypes. A similar pattern was observed in S. maritima populations in Thailand, where 28 SCoT primers produced 162 distinct bands (140–1200 bp), confirming their efficiency for DNA fingerprinting in halophytes, even when local genetic variation was low (Rittirongsakul et al., 2020). The effectiveness of ISSR markers in assessing genetic variation within Suaeda species has been demonstrated in previous studies. For example, Abd El-Maboud and Khalil (2013) reported a high level of polymorphism (99%) using ISSR primers across three Suaeda species (S. vera Forssk. ex J.F.Gmel., S. pruinosa Lange, and S. vermiculata) collected from diverse habitats along the Mediterranean coast of Egypt. These findings are consistent with our results, which also revealed high polymorphic efficiency and informativeness of ISSR markers in distinguishing among S. vermiculata ecotypes from Khuzestan. Overall, ISSR markers provide a broader view of genomic diversity, while SCoT markers offer finer resolution at the ecotype level, as indicated by minor local clustering observed in the PCoA for the southern ecotypes. Their complementary nature supports the combined use of both marker systems to assess neutral and potentially adaptive variation in halophytes such as S. vermiculata.

 

Genetic diversity

The analysis of genetic diversity indices based on both ISSR and SCoT markers revealed consistently higher levels of variation in northern ecotypes of S. vermiculata compared with southern ones (Table 5). In particular, the number and percentage of polymorphic loci (NPL and PL%), as well as the observed and effective number of alleles (Na and Ne), were greater in the northern group, indicating richer allelic diversity and lower allele fixation. The elevated Ne/Na ratio in the north further suggests more balanced allele frequencies, consistent with sustained gene flow or historically larger and more connected ecotype assemblages. Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon’s information index (I) also supported this pattern, showing higher values in the northern region for both marker systems. Collectively, these results indicate that ecological heterogeneity and the historical connectivity of northern habitats have promoted the maintenance of a more diverse and genetically stable gene pool compared with the environmentally more fragmented southern habitats. These observations are consistent with recent findings on S. salsa (L.) Pall., where distinct ecotypes adapted to saltmarsh and inland habitats were differentiated not only morphologically and genetically but also in terms of metabolite composition (Wang et al., 2023). Such habitat-driven differentiation highlights the role of environmental heterogeneity as a key evolutionary force shaping allelic richness and intraspecific variation among halophytic taxa. It is noteworthy, however, that the northern group included more sampled ecotypes (19 vs. 8), which may have partially inflated diversity estimates by capturing a broader allelic spectrum. Thus, while higher genetic diversity in the north is evident, part of this trend may be attributed to sampling imbalance. Future studies with more evenly distributed sampling will help refine the understanding of regional diversity patterns.

 

Genetic structuring and ecotype relationships

The North–South sampling imbalance (19 vs. 8 ecotypes) may have influenced the resolution of genetic patterns. Nevertheless, results from multilocus analyses, including UPGMA, PCoA, and STRUCTURE, consistently indicated extensive admixture and no clear geographic separation between northern and southern ecotypes. STRUCTURE assigned all 27 ecotypes to multiple clusters regardless of K (ISSR, K = 5; SCoT, K = 2; combined, K = 6), demonstrating a largely panmictic genetic organization. In UPGMA and PCoA analyses, a slight tendency for some southern ecotypes to cluster together was observed, particularly with SCoT markers. However, the low percentage of variance explained and the lack of support from STRUCTURE suggest that such clustering does not represent strong or consistent geographic differentiation. Despite habitat differences, gene flow and the retention of shared ancestral polymorphisms appear to maintain high levels of genetic variation within regions. Similar patterns have been reported in other halophytes. As reported by Jena & Das (2006), S. nudiflora (Willd.) Moq. populations maintain high within-population variability despite geographic isolation and distinct cytotypes. This indicates that inter-population divergence can occur alongside high local diversity under heterogeneous conditions. Habitat-driven differentiation may also explain the minor local structuring in S. vermiculata. Environmental selection pressures likely interact with ongoing gene flow to influence the genetic structure of ecotypes. Comparable findings were reported by Prinz et al. (2013) in S. maritima. Inland populations, although fragmented and isolated, still shared alleles with coastal populations. This was interpreted as evidence of occasional gene flow and persistence of ancestral polymorphisms across habitats. Such results support our observation that northern and southern ecotypes of S. vermiculata overlap in both PCoA and STRUCTURE analyses. Overall, weak genetic differentiation between regions appears to be moderated by three main factors: high dispersal capacity, mixed mating systems, and retention of ancestral polymorphisms. Halophyte species often maintain substantial within-group diversity even in fragmented or heterogeneous habitats (Dar et al., 2024). At the same time, localized substructuring can emerge without complete geographic separation, reflecting a balance between gene flow, historical connectivity, and habitat-specific selective pressures. The partial overlap of ecotypes from different regions further suggests ongoing or historical gene flow. Limited seed dispersal, facilitated by the small seed size and lack of specialized structures in S. vermiculata (El-Keblawy et al., 2018), likely suffices to maintain genetic connectivity across regions.

 

Molecular variance and gene flow

AMOVA results indicate that most genetic variation in S. vermiculata is retained within groups, while differentiation between the northern and southern groups is relatively low. Nevertheless, our analyses detected weak but statistically significant regional structuring (Table 6). The high intra-regional diversity aligns with S. vermiculata’s reproductive biology, which includes partial gynodioecy and notable pollen sterility (Fernández-Illescas et al., 2010). This mixed mating system, combining self-fertilization and outcrossing, influenced by male fertility and environmental factors, likely helps maintain genetic diversity and resilience in fragmented and saline habitats. Such reproductive plasticity is vital under environmental stress, as highlighted by Prinz et al. (2009), and probably contributes to the predominance of within-group genetic variation, a pattern common in long-lived, outcrossing plant species (Nybom, 2004). Comparable patterns have been documented in S. aegyptiaca populations from Khuzestan, where SCoT markers revealed high polymorphism and AMOVA confirmed predominant within-group variation (Haghighipor et al., 2024). These findings underscore a broader ecological and evolutionary strategy among halophytes to sustain genetic diversity through adaptive reproductive and dispersal mechanisms.

Collectively, the molecular variance data provide important insights for conservation management, emphasizing the need to preserve intra-regional genetic variation and the ecological processes sustaining it.

 

Implications for conservation and genetic resource management

The genetic structure of S. vermiculata ecotypes in Khuzestan, characterized by high intra-regional diversity and weak differentiation between northern and southern groups, carries significant implications for conservation and germplasm management. These results indicate that geographic proximity does not necessarily equate to genetic similarity, highlighting the need to preserve the full spectrum of genetic variation within each region. Conservation strategies should therefore move beyond simple geographic criteria. The selection of ecotypes for ex situ germplasm banks or in situ restoration programs should be informed by molecular genetic data, prioritizing genetically distinct ecotypes identified through clustering and PCoA analyses. This approach ensures comprehensive representation of the species’ genetic resources and enhances adaptive potential amid environmental changes. Moreover, the reproductive plasticity of S. vermiculata, as suggested by previous studies, may confer resilience to habitat fragmentation and salinity stress. Protecting ecotypes from diverse ecological contexts within each region can help conserve not only neutral genetic diversity but also adaptive variation important for long-term survival. Practically, conservation efforts should target several genetically divergent ecotypes from both northern and southern Khuzestan. Such an approach will support sustainable maintenance of S. vermiculata and improve the effectiveness of habitat restoration in saline environments.

 

Conclusion

This study provides the first comprehensive molecular characterization of genetic diversity and structure in 27 ecotypes of S. vermiculata from northern and southern Khuzestan, based on ISSR and SCoT markers. The complementary use of these marker systems revealed high overall polymorphism and showed weak regional structuring with substantial admixture among ecotypes. The analyses indicated that most genetic variation is distributed within regions rather than between them, highlighting substantial intra-regional heterogeneity. This pattern likely reflects moderate gene flow, ecological connectivity among saline habitats, and the species’ reproductive flexibility, including partial gynodioecy and variable male fertility. Northern and southern ecotypes largely shared overlapping genetic profiles, with only minor local differentiation. This underscores the importance of integrating molecular data into conservation and restoration planning, as geographic proximity alone does not reliably predict genetic similarity. Overall, these findings advance our understanding of genetic variation in S. vermiculata and provide a foundation for effective genetic resource management. Prioritizing genetically distinct ecotypes from different ecological contexts for germplasm collection and habitat rehabilitation can help safeguard the species’ adaptive potential and ensure its long-term persistence under environmental pressures.

 

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for financial support (GN.SCU.AA1402.165). We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable suggestions that improved the quality of this manuscript.

Abd El-Maboud, M. M., & Khalil, R. M. (2013). Ecophysiological and genetic studies on some species of the genus Suaeda Forssk ex Scop. in the Mediterranean Sea coast. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27(7), 811–825. https://B2n.ir/nj3277
Akhani, H. (2015). Plants and vegetation of the north-west Persian Gulf: The coasts and islands of Khore Musa, Mahshahr and adjacent areas. Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
Alotaibi, M. O., & Abd-Elgawad, M. E. (2022). ISSR and SCoT for evaluation of hereditary differences of 29 wild plants in Al Jubail Saudi Arabian. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 29(5), 3223–3231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.053
Alrawi, S. S., Buniya, H. K., & Al-Abide, N. M. M. (2023). Comparison of genetic characteristics among species of Suaeda spp. (Amaranthaceae) in the western Anbar plateau-Iraq. Journal of Biotechnology Research Center, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.24126/jobrc.2023.17.1.696
Al-Shamsi, N., Hussain, M. I., & El-Keblawy, A. (2020). Physiological responses of the xerohalophyte Suaeda vermiculata to salinity in its hyper-arid environment. Flora, 273, 151705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151705
Amom, T., Tikendra, L., Apana, N., Goutam, M., Sonia, P., Koijam, A. S., ..., & Nongdam, P. (2020). Efficiency of RAPD, ISSR, iPBS, SCoT and phytochemical markers in the genetic relationship study of five native and economically important bamboos of North-East India. Phytochemistry, 174, 112330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112330
Assadi, M. (2001). Chenopodiaceae. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. [In Persian]
Assadi, T., Bargahi, A., Nabipour, I., Mohebbi, G. H., Kholdebarin, B., Mohajerani, S., …, & Motamed, N. (2014). Determination of fatty acid composition of halophyte plant (Suaeda vermiculata) collected from the shorelines of Persian Gulf region (Bushehr Province). Iranian South Medical Journal, 17(4), 638–646. http://ismj.bpums.ac.ir/article-1-580-fa.html [In Persian]
Badlani, A. (2011). Molecular characterization of genetic divergence in Salicornia brachiata (Roxb.) using RAPD and ISSR markers [Unpublished Master thesis]. Saurashtra University.
Behera, T. K., Singh, A. K., & Staub, J. E. (2008). Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers for developing crop improvement strategies. Scientia Horticulturae, 115(3), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.08.013
Bidyananda, N., Jamir, I., Nowakowska, K., Varte, V., Vendrame, W. A., Devi, R. S., & Nongdam, P. (2024). Plant genetic diversity studies: Insights from DNA marker analyses. International Journal of Plant Biology, 15(3), 607–640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030046
Bornet, B., & Branchard, M. (2001). Nonanchored inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: Reproducible and specific tools for genome fingerprinting. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 19(3), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772892
Collard, B. C. Y., & Mackill, D. J. (2009). Start codon-targeted (SCoT) markers: A novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 27(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-008-0060-5
Dar, B. A., Al-Doss, A. A., Assaeed, A. M., Javed, M. M., Ghazy, A. I., Al-Rowaily, S. L., & Abd-ElGawad, A. M. (2024). Genetic variation among Aeluropus lagopoides populations growing in different saline regions. Diversity, 16(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16010059
Dinarvand, M. (2020). Flora of Khuzestan Province. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. [In Persian]
El-Keblawy, A., Al-Shamsi, N., & Mosa, K. (2018). Effect of maternal habitat, temperature and light on germination and salt tolerance of Suaeda vermiculata, a habitat-indifferent halophyte of arid Arabian deserts. Seed Science Research, 28(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258518000144
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S., & Goudet, J. (2005). Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14(8), 2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
Fernández-Illescas, F., Cabrera, J., Nieva, F. J. J., Márquez-García, B., Sánchez-Gullón, E., & Muñoz-Rodríguez, A. F. (2010). Production of aborted pollen in marsh species of Chenopodiaceae: Evidence of partial male sterility in Suadeae and Salsoleae species. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 288, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0321-2
Haghighipor, Z., Dehdari, M., Nasernakhaei, F., & Amiri Fahliani, R. (2024). Evaluation of genetic diversity of Suaeda aegyptiaca genotypes in Khuzestan Province using SCoT molecular markers. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal, 16(4), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.22103/jab.2024.22888.1549 [In Persian]
Hromadová, Z., Gálová, Z., Mikolášová, L., Balážová, Ž., Vivodík, M., & Chňapek, M. (2023). Efficiency of RAPD and SCoT markers in the genetic diversity assessment of the common bean. Plants, 12, 2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152763
Jayasundara, R., De Silva, W. L., Perera, D., & Attanayake, R. N. (2024). Start codon targeted markers as a suitable DNA marker to assess population genetic diversity of Suaeda maritima. Proceedings of the 28th Forestry and Environment Symposium. https://B2n.ir/ux6501
Jena, S. N., & Das, A. B. (2006). Inter-population variation of chromosome and RAPD markers of Suaeda nudiflora (Willd.) Moq. a mangrove species in India. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(4), 137–142. https://B2n.ir/mw7970
Kumar, V., Ram, R. B., & Rajvanshi, S. K. (2015). Standardization of DNA isolation and PCR protocols for ISSR analysis in cluster bean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] genotypes. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, 6(2), 208–213. https://B2n.ir/ek9823
Li, Y. L., & Liu, J. X. (2018) StructureSelector: a web-based software to select and visualize the optimal number of clusters using multiple methods. Molecular Ecology Resources, 18, 176–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12719
Mahdavi Lasini, M. J., Ranjbar Fordoie, A., Zandi Esfahan, E., & Dehghani Bidgoli, R. (2017). Potential of halophytes as source of edible oil. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 24(4), 920–927. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2017.114900 [In Persian]
Mozaffarian, V. (1999). Flora of Khuzestan. Research Center of Natural Resources and Animal Husbandry of Khuzestan, Ahvaz. [In Persian]
Nagaraju, J., Reddy, K. D., Nagaraja, G. M., & Sethuraman, B. N. (2001). Comparison of multilocus RFLPs and PCR-based marker systems for genetic analysis of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Heredity, 86(5), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00861.x
Nybom, H. (2004). Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology, 13(5), 1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x
Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
Prevost, A., & Wilkinson, M. J. (1999). A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and applied Genetics, 98(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051046
Prinz, K., Weising, K., & Hensen, I. (2009). Genetic structure of coastal and inland populations of the annual halophyte Suaeda maritima (L.) dumort. in Central Europe, inferred from amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Plant Biology, 11(6), 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00178.x
Prinz, K., Weising, K., & Hensen, I. (2013). Habitat fragmentation and recent bottlenecks influence genetic diversity and differentiation of the Central European halophyte Suaeda maritima (Chenopodiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 100(11), 2210–2218. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300097
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155(2), 945–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/155.2.945
Rezaei, J., Mehrjerdi, Z. M., & Mastali, H. (2018). ISSR based analysis of genetic diversity in some endangered species of Allium subg. Melanocrommyum. Genetika, 50(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1801059R
Rittirongsakul, K., Srinual, A., & Vanijajiva, O. (2020). Anatomical features and SCoT profiles provide new insight into phenotypic plasticity in the halophyte Suaeda maritima in Thailand. Biodiversitas, 21(3), 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210331
Rohlf, F. J. (2005). NTSYSpc (Numerical Taxonomy & Multivariate Analysis System). Version 2.2. Exeter Software, Applied Biostatistics Inc.
Roldan-Ruiz, I., Dendauw, J., Van Bockstaele, E., Depicker, A., & De Loose, M. A. F. L. P. (2000). AFLP markers reveal high polymorphic rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Molecular Breeding, 6(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009680614564
Sharma, H., Sharma, P., Sharma, R., Rana, M., & Dogra, R. (2015). DNA fingerprinting of pear genotypes to estimate genetic relationship using ISSR markers. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 21, 195–199. https://B2n.ir/mw6961
Wang, Z., Pan, J., Gao, T., Wang, Q., Zhou, D., Dong, X., ..., & Zhang, X. (2023). Ecological differentiation of the halophyte Suaeda salsa under different habitat conditions. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3684550/v1
Weber, D. J., Ansari, R., Gul, B., & Khan, M. A. (2007). Potential of halophytes as source of edible oil. Journal of Arid Environments, 68(2), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.05.010
Zietkiewicz, E., Rafalski, A., & Labuda, D. (1994). Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics, 20(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151